|

International
Maritime Transport
Section

Our
missions for
International
Maritime Transport
Market Analysis by
information bulletins on major supply and demand indicators in the
sectors of shipping and shipbuilding.
ECSEI is
Continuous statistical evaluations of the shipping and shipbuilding
markets, information on the development of seaborne trade and freight
rates, data on major seaports of the world, as well as on shipping and
goods traffic on sea canals and detailed statistical analyses of
individual markets.
ECSEI
Market Analysis and study
Included
:
-
World Merchant Fleet
-
World Tanker Market
-
World Bulk Carrier Market
-
World Container and General Cargo Shipping
-
World Merchant Fleet by Ownership Patterns
-
World Passenger and Cruise Shipping /ISL Cruise Fleet Register
-
World Shipbuilding and Shipbuilders
-
Major Shipping Nations
-
World Seaborne Trade and World Port Traffic
-
The Future World
Merchant Fleet - New Orders and Order Book
-
Ports and Sea Canals
-
Liner shipping

The International Maritime
Organization (IMO)
Our ECSEI Studies
Included comprehensive regulatory framework for shipping and its remit
today includes safety, environmental concerns, legal matters, technical
co-operation, Maritime Security and the efficiency of shipping.
The Maritime Treaties:
-
The Convention
establishing the International Maritime Organization (IMO)
-
The international
safety of life at sea convention – SOLAS
-
The convention for
the prevention of pollution by ships - MARPOL
-
The convention on
standards of training for seafarers – STCW
-
The International
Convention on Search and Rescue
-
The International
Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-operation
-
The International
Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage
-
The convention
establishing the International Fund for Compensation for Oil
Pollution Damage
-
The Athens Convention
covering liability and compensation for passengers at sea
-
The Protocol on the
Establishment of a Supplementary Fund for Oil Pollution Damage 2003
-
International
Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001
-
The International
Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS Code)
-
The IMO
recommendations governing every facet of shipping
Legal Committee
-
Liability and
Compensation
-
IMO and ILO Working
Groups on Seafarer
-
Removal of Wrecks
-
IMO and UNCLOS
-
Arrest of Ships
Convention
-
Liens and Mortgages
Convention
-
The Convention on
Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims
-
The International
Convention on Liability and Compensation for damage in Connection
with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious substances (HNS)

DRY BULK MARKET

Dry
bulk carriers transport large volume cargoes in ship loads. Major dry
bulk commodities consist of industrial raw materials including iron ore,
coal, grain, bauxite and alumina. Minor bulks such as soya beans/meal,
steel products, phosphate rocks and sulphur also accounts for a
significant part of the dry bulk trade.
Dry bulk carriers
are generally designed for simplicity and cheapness. However some of the
small vessels are of higher technical designs in order to trade special
cargoes such as cements and rocks. These vessels are somewhat similar to
multipurpose vessels in both size and design.
The ownership of
dry bulk tonnage is highly dispersed compared to the ownership of crude
oil tankers, chemical tankers and containerships.
The dry cargo
market is a large mixture of spot arrangements, time-charter agreements
and industrial shipping.
|
Major bulk carrier size categories |
|
Name |
Size in DWT |
Ships |
Traffic |
|
Handysize |
10,000 to 35,000 |
34% |
18% |
|
Handymax |
35,000 to 55,000 |
37% |
|
Panamax |
60,000 to 80,000 |
19% |
20% |
|
Capesize |
80,000 and over |
10% |
62% |
Baltic Dry Index 8 / 3 / 2009

DRY BULK Market -
September 21st, 2009
New
record levels of steel production in China this week have failed to
impress the Cape market which fell down to levels not seen since
May this year. While discussions about the way iron ore prices will be
settled in the future are still ongoing, current prices have been
stabilizing thanks to European, Japanese and Korean mills progressive
come back on the market, in addition to the continuous buying spree of
Chinese steel makers.
Port congestion
has also globally decreased last week but the number of ships waiting
for discharge in loading and unloading ports in China and Brazil is
still playing ping pong game well over the level of the table. On the
grain front some good prospects have been announced this week for the
winter harvest of corn and soybeans in the US, calling for a good export
season from this area.
In this unstable
context some players still bet on the new building market to develop
their business; this week the order for ten 35,000 tonners at Shanghai
Shipyard has been revealed, while rumors about Vale looking for up to 20
VLOCs to enforce its new export strategy have circulated.
Maybe the talks
between STX Pan Ocean and Vale about long term iron ore shipping
contract (300 Mt over 25 years) are not completely disconnected from
this move,but no link has so far been made between the two operations.
Capesize

Lacking
direction two weeks ago the Cape market has found its way (down) last
week, with the BCI losing 486 points back to levels of May this year.
The situation is different today as, while the market suffered from a
lack of cargoes in the early months of 2009, the main worry is now an
oversupply of tonnage.
Neither the Atlantic, nor the Pacific
offered better conditions for those who were seeking places of refuge.
Any confirmation of a stronger come back of European, Japanese and
Korean still mills would be welcomed by the owners as it may come on top
of China import flow which seems to be here to stay according to most
commodity analysts.
Some period fixtures below 1 year have
been reported last week with some maybe thinking that the market is
bottoming out.
Panamax

The Panamax market saw little change on the week (BPI +22 points & 4
TC’s +US$194). Rates in the east nudged up slightly after a purge at the
start of the week by BHP Billiton, rumoured to have taken 5-6 ships to
do an east Australian coal run to China option India.
Despite a
general softening in the Atlantic, tonnage continued to be tight in the
north Atlantic, and charterers with US Gulf front haul stems continued
to pick off the readily-available tonnage in the Far East wanting a
longer duration round voyage rather than just short trips in the east at
a marginal increase in rates. Period wise, a handful of short period
fixtures at steady numbers, and on the longer term there was a deal done
at a
surprisingly improved
US$23,000/day for 11/13 months, although this was a larger than index
vessel for a prompt Atlantic delivery, the rate maybe also reflected the
signature of the charterer…
Comparison of sizes
|
Class |
Panamax |
Panamax II |
|
Length |
1,050 ft (320.04 m) |
1,400 ft (426.72 m) |
|
Width |
110 ft
(33.53 m) |
180 ft
(54.86 m) |
|
Draft |
41 ft
(12.50 m) |
60 ft
(18.29 m) |
|
TEU |
5000 |
12000 |
Supra/Handy

The Handy market
resisted much better than the bigger sizes, with Handysizes increasing
about US$500 overall to finish around US$13,000/day on average, and
Supras increasing by US$1,500 to finish around US$20,000/day on average.
Stems were
sufficient to keep the market afloat. For Handysizes in the Atlantic the
strong flow of fertilizers out of Cont down to ECSA, made ECSA the
weakest loading zone, the first being US Gulf, the second being the
Continent; with the overall TARV in the mid high teens and the PARV in
the very low
teens.
|